So...the JUDGES ARE CORRUPT! Have you ever received a "Default Judgment" whereby the Judge "...ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff's [third-party debt collector] Motion To Strike Defendant's Answer [my special appearance for my STRAWMAN] is GRANTED..." The Judge completely through out my Affidavit... My Answer was a request motion for dismissal for the facts that (a) there is no verification of a wet ink signature between the third-party debt collector and my STRAWMAN and (b) the third-party debt collector does not have first-hand knowledge of the alleged debt. I just received this notification yesterday, and need to get something out tomorrow. What are some options you would consider to handle this BS?

Posted by Nathan-Leon:Roberts at 2020-10-18 16:56:02 UTC