The entire issue here is the simple fact that as private man; we too have the rite to be [i]n public view but; remain in private rite despite anyone elses definition of ones actions thereof... As we discussed in zoom earlier today - just because one is observable in a public forum/platform; they have the rite of privacy by use of "pen name" AND function thereforthwith without fettering!!! Creator of the content not by intendment of any statutory SMU BullShit!!! We have right of use for our own private creations... https://youtu.be/PvLtwV7DFwg _____________________________________________ May 9th, 2016 - CNN: https://youtu.be/Km3klBVI2wo 35 second mark... Like I said... Moronic and inconsistent... The lie is patently contemptuous!!! _____________________________________________ AND this shits Been going on! Can you say; "continuous criminal activity"...? [18 U.S. Code § 371 - Conspiracy to commit offense or to defraud United States] Suckerbooger - you won't need any pants!!! https://youtu.be/TKaLcyevefQ _____________________________________________ By political means which are also "private rite"...? To be or not to be... That is the question...!!! To have political views means one has public views... To be political is to be public... hmmm... Quite a conundrum to that fiction huh... lol... Now: Is political driven by commerce...? Is religion driven by commerce...? Is society drivenby commerce...? Is public driven bycommerce...? Is privacy driven by commerce...?

Posted by El Hotepsekhemwy Pero at 2020-12-10 03:29:17 UTC