They keep using the word "country" but it seems that they don't know what it means! lol The Reconstruction Framers’ intent to grant citizenship to all those born on U.S. soil, regardless of race, origin, or status, was turned into the powerfully plain language of Section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment: “All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the state wherein they reside.” The text of the ratified Citizenship Clause embodies the jus soli rule of citizenship, under which citizenship is acquired by right of the soil (contrasted with jus sanguinis, according to which citizenship is granted according to bloodline). Birthright citizenship is a form of “ascriptive” citizenship because one’s political membership turns on an objective circumstance—place of birth. The text of the Fourteenth Amendment is not the only place in the Constitution that reflects the notion that citizenship can accrue from the circumstances of one’s birth: Article II of the Constitution, provides that any “natural born citizen” who meets age and residency requirements is eligible to become President. Just as the Citizenship Clause sets forth birth on U.S soil as the condition for citizenship—not race or bloodline—Article II specifies that the relevant qualification for the presidency of the United States is birth‐conferred citizenship, not any particular ancestry. For more than a century, it has been the common understanding that the Constitution’s treatment of citizenship follows the jus soli rule. Case law just after ratification of the Fourteenth Amendment interpreted the Citizenship Clause to confer automatic citizenship on persons born in the United States regardless of their parents’ immigration status. In the 1886 case of Look Tin Sing, for example, the court held that a child of Chinese parents—who still retained their status as Chinese citizens, despite their presence in the United States—was a U.S. citizen under the Citizenship Clause because he was born on U.S. soil. As the court stated plainly, “It is enough that he was born here, whatever was the status of his parents.”9 https://www.theusconstitution.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/12/20110331_Issue_Brief_Elizabeth_Wydra_Born_Under_the_Constitution.pdf The Reconstruction Acts, or Military Reconstruction Acts, (March 2, 1867, 14 Stat. 428-430, c.153; March 23, 1867, 15 Stat. 2-5, c.6; July 19, 1867, 15 Stat. 14-16, c.30; and March 11, 1868, 15 Stat. 41, c.25) were four statutes passed during the Reconstruction Era by the 40th United States Congress addressing requirement for Southern States to be readmitted to the Union. The actual title of the initial legislation was "An act to provide for the more efficient government of the Rebel States"[1] and it was passed on March 4, 1867. Fulfillment of the requirements of the Acts was necessary for the former Confederate States to be readmitted to the Union from military and Federal control imposed during and after the American Civil War. The Acts excluded Tennessee, which had already ratified the 14th Amendment and had been readmitted to the Union on July 24, 1866.[2] July 9th 1868, the Fourteenth Amendment https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reconstruction_Acts March 2, 1867, 14 Stat. 428-430 c. 153 [Jail for 14A citizens? Repealed?] https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/39th-congress/session-2/c39s2ch153.pdf March 23, 1867, 15 Stat. 2-5 c. 6 [Rebel States. An act supplementary to an act entitled "An Act to provide for the more efficient Government of the Rebel States," passed March second, eighteen hundred and sixty-seven, and to facilitate restoration. chap. VI ] AND [March 11, 1868, 15 Stat. 41] https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/40th-congress/c40.pdf July 19, 1867, 15 Stat. 14-16 c. 30 [ chap xxx: passed on the twenty-third day of March, in the year one thousand eight hundred and sixty-seven, that the governments then existing in the rebel States of Virginia, North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Louisiana, Florida, Texas, and Arkansas were not legal State governments; and that thereafter said governments, if continued, were to be continued subject in all respects to the military commanders of the respective districts, and to the paramount authority of Congress.] https://www.loc.gov/law/help/statutes-at-large/40th-congress/session-1/c40s1ch30.pdf

Posted by MalikaDulce at 2020-11-23 19:56:51 UTC