#QUITVOLUNTEERING YUSUFU DANMOLA, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, (1) QUESTIONS FOR REVIEW Is the Court Allowed to Enforce a Law not in Pursuance with the Constitution? "A claim or right arising out of an alleged breach may be discharged in whole or part without consideration by agreement of the aggrieved party in an authenticated record." "There, every man is independent of all laws, except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed by his fellowmen without his consent." Cruden v. Neale, 2 N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E. . 70. "The term "liberty" ... denotes not merely freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to contract to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to aquire useful knowledge, to marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of his own conscience.. . The established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with, under guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action." Meyer v. Nebraska, 262 U.S. 390, 399, 400. "The right to be let alone the most comprhensive of rights and the right most valued by civilized men. To protect that right, every unjustifiable intrusion by the government upon the privacy of the individual, whatever the means employed, must be deemed a violation of the Fourth Amendment." Olmstead v. U.S., 277 U.S. 438, 478 (1928). ______________________________ Above quoted from Certiorari here: https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/18/18-7080/76618/20181218153201895_00000008.pdf?fbclid=IwAR2YKli3WmGmprED2DBFM3O9qA4_PyNPTOgaYtMTLKPun-fdd2XbRJ9sCJw

Posted by El Hotepsekhemwy Pero at 2020-11-22 07:10:48 UTC