I was given the publisher's premise to share. To like minded man and women not agents This company, __________________________, stated that they accept payment via legal tender drawn on a bank. Bank is any person that receives (payment check from work), deposits (money into wallet), makes loans (friend wants to borrow money), issues tender (use money to buy something), or any of these functions (Black Law Dictionary). No national bank, Federal Reserve, shall make any loan from its assets or lend its credit (12 USC 83), this company did not issue its securities to fund the account – I did, this company fraudulently claims they issued the money. This company issued a non-negotiable check in the form of a contract that needed my tendering to turn it into legal tender which I have done so by restricted endorsement. This company then sent me a bill in the mail which I have done a bankers acceptance to as one can’t pay a promise to pay with a promise to pay (money is a promise to pay). This company is forbidden to accept a certain form of tender to satisfy this obligation (public law 73-10). I am not a Federal Reserve Agent; I do not have authority to use Federal Reserve Securities (12 USC 411); I have the right to issue my own tender which is what this contract is (15 USC 683). According to Federal Acquisition Regulations a deposit of funds has created a special account bearing my name. This company has then refused to recognize this special deposit as funds delivered and a payment being made. This legal tender drawn on the U.S. Treasury constitute as good funds available for immediate withdrawal (CRS 38-35-125, 12 CFR 229.10(c), 31 CFR 240.2). This company presented this legal tender to a Federal Reserve Bank and was given immediate credit (31 CFR 240.12, 31 USC 3342, 31 USC 3322), however, they did not credit my account that a payment was made. This tender issued under the authority and full faith and credit of United States is required by law to be accepted and treated as any other tender, such as a Federal Reserve security (Public Law 91-508, 97-280), although this company has not discharged the claimed debt as it has unlawfully contracted for public funds which I am not authorized to issue. As a qualified purchaser, accredited investor, foreign merchant bank, none-public traded company, natural person this tender is issued (Investment Act of 1940 sections 3(c)(1), 3(c)(7)) and exempted under regulation to be registered (17 CFR 230.501(a)(8), 501(a)(5), 501(e)(1)(iv). According to the State Attorney General the consumer is always the creditor for all transactions making the contract US dollar and legal tender (15 USC 683). This company has mandated that I issue Federal Reserve Securities to pay for this pre-paid contract. All companies with a United States EIN or TIN, subsidiary of municipality United States, are bankrupt (11 USC 109), therefore I am the sole creditor (17 CFR 230.501(a)(8)) for this account. This company is not in compliance with FASB No. 95 statement of cash flows and needs to credit my payment as a cash deposit when the contract was made. By withholding and misrepresenting vital information concerning the origination of funds, them claiming they issued the funds, it has intentionally created fraud. This contract is also restricted endorsed to negotiate the instrument, restrict payment, and reduce my liability. Upon restricted endorsement property which intended to transfer has transferred transferring all contractual, property, and equitable rights (CRS 4-3-205). I have absolute property rights defeating all stoppage in transit which this company has stopped due to their fraudulent book keeping. This company engages in double book keeping accounting. Double-entry bookkeeping, in accordance to Generally Accepted Accounting Principles, is a system of book keeping where every entry requires a corresponding and opposite entry to a different account. However, this company has created a fraudulent book and claims that I owe on that book. I have also given this company stocks - birth certificate and a license – to withdraw money from to pay for this contract. All certificates are securities according to Security Act of 1933 while a license is defined as (24-4-102(7)) a certificate… I.E. they are both securities which were traded to fund the account which makes them stocks. They have used these stocks to collect payment but have not credited my account accordingly, this could possibly be a third book. This company has raped and pillaged my securities then have claimed that I have not paid them as they have not received their precious Federal Reserve Securities that I have no authority issuing and using. I have handled my portion in accordance to Federal Acquisition Regulations and Security Exchange Commission as I have given many different forms of legal tender, contract and issuance of a stock, satisfying the debt. This company claims that I owe them money when they are not in compliance of statement of cash flows and engages in fraudulent book keeping. By not honoring legal tender and doing fraudulent accounting this company commits mail fraud, sedation, financial treason, security fraud, insider trading, embezzlement, extortion, piracy and privateering, racketeering, robbery, terrorism, concealment of assets, tax evasion, money laundering, solicitation to commit a crime, accounting generally for public money, theft by bank examiner, economic espionage, unfair trade practices, and discrimination against a foreign bank.

Posted by tcasad at 2020-10-22 01:28:25 UTC